![menace to society scenes menace to society scenes](http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_28Zhe0fBzGQ/SngxfoK29RI/AAAAAAAAAC4/DUrful3Tlu4/s320/Menace+gang.jpg)
![menace to society scenes menace to society scenes](https://i.imgur.com/Njnn19N.jpg)
His desire to marry Laurey is not unfounded why do we allow the “handsome” Curly to creep on Laurey, yet view Jud as a villain when he does exactly the same thing? In this revival of the musical, there is a clear separation between the personas and actions of Curly and Jud. Does she decide to marry the always-moving swindler, who himself has been swindled into a relationship with Annie, or does she choose the lovesick but half-witted Will Parker? The secondary plot brings an exciting and rambunctious tone to the musical, one that I personally found more entertaining than the main storyline.Ī large complaint of mine about the original production of Oklahoma! is that Jud is painted as this creepy, evil figure when he is, in fact, a human with needs and wants, just like every other character in the plot. Throughout the show we are also introduced to a secondary plotline: We meet Ado Annie, a spontaneous and impulsive young woman who must choose her lover. Jud and Curly’s feud unfolds during the night of an auction and eventually, Laurey falls for Curly, angering Jud to the point of violence. Fortunately, through the vision of director Daniel Fish, Oklahoma! has expanded its commentary from an off-putting love story to a social statement on gun violence and the role of the villain in our stories.įor those who have never had the opportunity to see Oklahoma!, the storyline follows the “enemies to lovers” trope between Laurey, the sassy young woman of our story, and Curly, the cocky cowboy who believes “everything’s going way.” Our villain, the farmhand Jud Fry, is depicted as a violent porn addict who dreams of marrying Laurey. Though at its birth, Oklahoma! was deemed artistically revolutionary as the first modern musical, it is clear that the work has evolved in the ever-changing theater world. I really didn't give a damn if the protagonist of Menace died, he just didn't have much charisma.Many thespians would agree that Oklahoma! is, quite frankly, an outdated musical. Also, I thought Boyz had better actors all around, and I cared more about the characters. Boyz N tha Hood has rare moments of violence, and they resonated more for it. The violence began to pile up to the point that it diluted the impact and became almost an action flick.
![menace to society scenes menace to society scenes](https://www.ferolos.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Menace-II-Society-Movie-Scene-T-Shirt.jpg)
Little moments like when Furious realizes Tre jumped out the window of his bedroom to go on a drive-by, embraces Tre's girlfriend and shows fear for the first time in the movie, those stick out in my memory.īy contrast, Menace had a lot of memorable scenes as well, but none of them really affected me on that level. packed a heavier emotional punch than anything in Menace. Scenes like the cops harassing and threatening Tre with a gun, the childhood prologue, the death of Doughboy's brother (and its immediate aftermath), etc.
#MENACE TO SOCIETY SCENES MOVIE#
Both of them were first-time filmmakers, right?īut Boyz was a more powerful movie overall for me. had a better grip on the language of cinema than Singleton at that point in their careers. There are a lot of virtuoso scenes, like the steadycam shot that goes from the curb through a house party and out into the backyard. Menace was the more assured movie from a filmmaking standpoint.